AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us









 Friday, June 27, 2008
posted on Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 26, 2008
The House Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee is now holding hearings entitled “An Examination of Discrimination Against Trangender Americans in the Workplace.”  View the live video here.

One of the goals of these hearings is to advance legislation which would require businesses and religious organizations to hire cross dressers and sex-change operation recipients despite any religious or moral convictions which would be violated.

posted on Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:23:47 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 23, 2008
As this gay publication reports, Congress will hold hearings on dangerous legislation such as ENDA which would endanger religious liberty at the expense of a misguided notion of “gay rights.” 

posted on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:40:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 17, 2008
As this NPR article demonstrates, when “gay rights” and religious liberty conflict, religious liberty usually loses.  This is an important fact to emphasize as gay couples are now obtaining marriage licenses in California.

A few examples cited by NPR:

A few cases: Yeshiva University was ordered to allow same-sex couples in its married dormitory. A Christian school has been sued for expelling two allegedly lesbian students. Catholic Charities abandoned its adoption service in Massachusetts after it was told to place children with same-sex couples. The same happened with a private company operating in California.

 

A psychologist in Mississippi who refused to counsel a lesbian couple lost her case, and legal experts believe that a doctor who refused to provide IVF services to a lesbian woman is about to lose his pending case before the California Supreme Court.

 

And then there's the case of a wedding photographer in Albuquerque, N.M.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:26:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
CitizenLink reports.  If the dangerous “hate (thought) crimes” and ENDA legislation now in Congress gets passed into law, we could see similar persecution in the United States.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:14:07 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 12, 2008
Brian Fitzpatrick explains how the modern push for “gay rights” endangers religious liberty.  He catalogues the outrageous international cases of religious discrimination and demonstrates how legislation currently being pushed in Congress will bring such restrictions to the United States.

Our friends at FRC have also been sounding the alarm.  If you don’t want churches, private schools, and businesses to be forced to hire homosexuals or “transgendered” people and you don’t want Christians to be persecuted for their religious convictions contact Congress today.  Call both your senators and your representative and urge them to vote against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act or any legislation giving “domestic partnership” benefits to homosexual couples.

posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:29:56 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, May 30, 2008
It appears the Colorado Legislature is trying to keep up with California for nuttiness.  As the Colorado Springs Gazette reports, Gov. Ritter signed a bill into law which would allow the “transgendered” to use whichever restroom they prefer and no private business is allowed to prohibit this activity, all in the name of so-called “non-discrimination” and “equality.”  Excerpt:

 
One aspect of the law enables transgenders - those who were born one gender but identify with the other - to use public restrooms in which they feel most comfortable.

 

Focus founder James Dobson said Thursday:

 

"Who would believe that the Colorado state Legislature and its governor would have made it legal for men to enter and use women's restrooms and locker room facilities without notice or explanation?

 

"Henceforth, every woman and little girl will have to fear that a predator, bisexual, cross-dresser or even a homosexual or heterosexual male might walk in and relieve himself in their presence."

Don’t think this kind of legislation won’t be coming to a state near you in the near future.  Liberal activist are pushing for similar legislation on the federal level such as ENDA and other items.

Keep checking AdvanceUSA Blog for the latest news on these important issues.



posted on Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:55:41 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, May 22, 2008
CitizenLink reports on the outrageous “non-discrimination” legislation in Colorado which would make “open to men, women, bisexuals, transsexuals and ‘transgendered’ individuals.”  If ENDA or similar legislation is passed in Congress, the entire country could be subjected to these kinds of policies.


Graphic source: CitizenLink
posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:22:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Daniel Herbster reporting

Exodus International is the largest network of former homosexuals in the world and assists local ministries around the world in helping people overcome same-sex attraction and the homosexual lifestyle through a relationship with Christ.  They also use their unique expertise to speak out on important cultural and societal issues.  I’ve had the opportunity to work with members of Exodus on a number of occasions so it’s great to be able to interview my friend Randy Thomas who is Vice President of Exodus.  The following is my interview with Randy.

DH: Randy, how long has Exodus been in existence and how did it get started?

RT: In 1976, sixty-two ministry leaders met in California to talk about their efforts to help those dealing with unwanted same-sex attraction and how they, as independent ministries, could network to help one another in this effort. The vision and name for Exodus was born out of obvious parallels that could be drawn from the Children of Israel leaving Egypt and entering the Promise Land.  These visionaries had the accurate view that being “gay” should not be the only option for those with same sex attractions.  They knew that our “Promise Land” was the knowledge of and relationship with Jesus Christ.  They knew that there was so much more to life than what a gay ideology was offering and so they developed the network we now know as Exodus.  Thirty-three years later our network has over 200 member agencies across North America who reach thousands of people seeking help.  We are also affiliated with other ministries around the world who offer this perspective on homosexuality to a world hungering for positive alternatives.

Sixty-two people cast a vision that has now helped millions of people and educated millions more about biblical sexuality.

DH: One of the tenants of our modern, politically correct culture holds that sexual orientation is inherent and unchangeable but “gender identity” is unfixed and can change.  Do you think this is true, and how does Exodus’s unique perspective relate to this issue?

RT: Recently I wrote on my personal blog a post called “The Transgender Double Standard.”  In it I shared, ‘It’s always astounded me how willing some in the gay activist community are to celebrate someone surgically altering their body to “become” who they perceive to be internally.  Yet when I determine I want to reorient my sexual orientation, which does not require drastic surgery or body altering drugs, according to those same activists, I am the one doing damage to myself and others by simply holding to a particular worldview that brings me contentment and sexual reorientation.  The transgendered are applauded for radically altering their bodies while I am scolded for holding the belief that I would be happier living out who I truly am regardless of my past life as a gay identified man.  It¹s ok for someone to ignore what they were obviously born as, but for people like me - we are told being “gay” is genetic and should be embraced because we have no other option.’

This is a terrible conundrum for militant gay activism because their own moral relativism is being exposed.  We were all created with free will.  We all have the ability to define right and wrong for ourselves.  The issue with moral relativism is that eventually it will prove out to be hypocritical because it is self based moral judgments instead of God¹s creative intent which is unchanging.  Sixteen years ago I decided that maybe God’s intent for my sexuality and identity just might be beyond my own seemingly logical conclusions.  I started to question everything in life and attempting to live out my identity and sexuality in accordance with my faith.  My identity has completely changed in that I am not a “gay” man anymore.  I am a Christian.  I will hopefully be known as a man of God.  My sexual orientation has shifted a great deal as a byproduct of my pursuing purity and holiness.

Notice I said shifted.  I am not above temptation and if temptation happens, I know why and what to do about it.  Regardless, homosexuality does not have the power to determine who I am or how I steward my sexuality.

DH: Would you mind telling us about your background and how you came to work at Exodus?

posted on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:59:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, May 06, 2008
A so-called “anti-discrimination” bill in the Colorado legislature is very similar to the proposed ENDA legislation in the U.S. Congress both of which would award special privileges to homosexuals and transgenders based on their “actual or perceived” sexual behavior.  Concerned citizens must be vigilant to oppose this kind of dangerous legislation.  The Alliance Defense Fund gave testimony against the bill which is also very relevant to the federal version.  Excerpt:

 
“The government shouldn’t cater to the agenda of political activist groups and then use the strong arm of the law to force it on the public,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Austin R. Nimocks.  “This law would not protect rights but would grant special privileges based strictly on someone’s sexual behavior.  Further, those privileges would have a significant impact on the constitutional rights of Coloradoans who have a moral objection to homosexual behavior.”

posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:47:06 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, April 25, 2008
CitizenLink reports on this troubling sign of things to come.

posted on Friday, April 25, 2008 8:33:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Homosexual activists gathered in our nation’s capital from a few days ago until Tax Day (today) lobbying for what they call “family values.”  Their agenda includes supposed anti-discrimination legislation like ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) and instituting laws which provide what substantively amount to marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

Concerned citizens must be careful to clearly state that we do not hate homosexuals or wish to persecute them, but that we strongly object to creating special rights and privileges based on sexual behavior and we believe that organizations and companies should have the right to deem certain behavior unacceptable for their employees.

If these legislative goals proceed they will likely include some sort of “religious exemptions” which only protect churches and other explicitly religious organizations, but which do not cover individual employers such as private companies and certain non-profits.  For example, while a Catholic church might be exempted from being forced to hire or accommodate homosexuals or same-sex couples, a Catholic businessman or leader of a faith-based charity would not be protected.  The religious freedoms of individuals should be protected, not just the religious freedom of large organizations.

The bottom line is that sexual behavior should not be given preferential treatment under law under the guise of anti-discrimination.  Also, the crucial institution of marriage should not be undermined by offering special marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

ACTION: We do not yet know when Congress will consider such legislation, but we encourage you to contact your representative and both your senators to urge them to oppose ENDA and other attempts to give substantive marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

posted on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:33:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, April 10, 2008
The Washington Times reported in February on the case of Elaine Huguenin, a Christian photographer in New Mexico, who refused to take pictures of a lesbian civil ceremony.  Elaine is being prosecuted under anti-discrimination laws and the Alliance Defense Fund is now coming to her assistance.  This case is a chilling reminder of why anti-discrimination laws based on “sexual orientation or gender identity” should be opposed, especially on the federal level (i.e. ENDA).  Here’s an excerpt from the Times:

An evangelical Christian photographer was brought before the New Mexico Human Rights Commission after she declined for religious reasons to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony.

 

When Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, N.M., declined in September 2006 an e-mail request from a lesbian couple to photograph their ceremony, one of the lesbians responded by lodging a human rights complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, the state agency charged with enforcing state anti-discrimination laws and sending cases to the commission to be adjudicated.

LifeSiteNews also reported on this case.

posted on Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:37:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, February 11, 2008
The Wall Street Journal mentions the dangerous Employment Non-Discrimination Act in an article on several anti-business bills that could progress in the current Congress.  Another concern with ENDA, besides restrictive government regulation of business, is the threat that non-discrimination laws based on “actual or perceived” sexual preferences could pose to religious freedom.

Excerpt:

…the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, passed the House of Representatives last fall. It would prohibit discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation." In short, private-sector employers who have religious or other objections to homosexuality would be told their moral views lack legitimacy.

 

The Bush administration has announced its opposition, noting that the bill raises constitutional problems and "turns on imprecise and subjective terms that would make interpretation, compliance, and enforcement extremely difficult" and is "virtually certain to encourage burdensome litigation." Sen. John McCain is opposed to such legislation; Sens. Obama and Clinton are supporters. Sen. Edward Kennedy is expected to introduce the bill later this year in the Senate.


For more information on ENDA click here.

posted on Monday, February 11, 2008 9:07:19 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, February 05, 2008
CitizenLink has two stories that illustrate the dangers to religious freedom implicit to “hate crimes” and “non-discrimination” laws that pertain to sexual orientation.

·         Dangerous legislation could force charities that run soup kitchens and homeless shelters to hire homosexuals

·         Teachers in U.K. Told to Avoid Saying 'Mom' and 'Dad'

posted on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:44:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Friday, November 16, 2007
AdvanceUSA has learned that ENDA, after having passing the House of Representatives recently, will likely be put on the Senate “calendar” within a week.  This means that it could be considered at any time.  However, there are about a hundred total bills on the Senate calendar, so it is not certain that the Senate vote on ENDA is imminent.  It could even be pushed back to next year.

Be assured AdvanceUSA will keep a watchful eye on this dangerous legislation.  For more information on ENDA click here or here.

posted on Friday, November 16, 2007 7:10:07 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Bishop Harry Jackson, Jr. voices his concerns with a number of issues he sees as a threat to religious freedom.  Doubtless the ENDA bill and hate crimes legislation are clear and present dangers to free religious expression, and the movement to resurrect the discredited “fairness doctrine” is a blatant affront to free speech.  Read Jackson’s full column here.

For more information on religious freedom click here or here.

posted on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:28:14 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, November 08, 2007
Yesterday the House passed ENDA by a vote of 235 - 184.  Check the vote box below or on the Congress Vote Watch page to see how your representative voted on this dangerous legislation.  An amendment proposed by Rep. George Miller (D-CA) to broaden the religious exemption for churches and other religious institutions passed, but the bill still ignores the threats to the religious freedom of regular employers.  Furthermore, the underlying bill sets a dangerous precedent by elevating sexual behavior as a civil rights issue akin to race, religion, or gender.  Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO) had an excellent article Tuesday in Human Events which explains the serious religious freedom and litigation concerns with ENDA.  Fortunately, the President has vowed to veto the legislation.

For more information on this threat to religious freedom which is also an open door to wasteful and malicious litigation, check the AdvanceUSA home page or the ENDA category at AdvanceUSA Blog.

House Vote on H.R. 3685, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (Passed)
November 7, 2007
Full Results | News Story

 

Yeas

Nays

PRES

NV

Republican

35

159

6

Democratic

200

25

8

Independent

TOTALS

235

184

14

posted on Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:49:40 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, November 06, 2007
H.R. 3685, the dangerous Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), will likely be voted on today in the House of Representatives.  While liberals may attempt to whitewash it with religious freedom and marriage protections ENDA is still a dangerous step toward special federal protections based on sexual behavior.  ENDA is part of the overarching homosexual strategy to undermine traditional marriage and legitimize deviant sexual behavior.  For more information on ENDA click here or here.

House Minority Leader Roy Blunt (R-MO) has a very helpful article today in Human Events which explains the serious religious freedom and litigation concerns with ENDA which would be well worth your time to consider.  Excerpt:

One thing, however, is certain: Passage of this bill would effectively create a brand new market for litigation, and set up the opportunity for billions of dollars for trial lawyers.  Another bill, another Democratic payback to their special interests, more burdens on American small businesses, more attempts to limit religious speech -- well, just another day under this Democratic Congress. 

AdvanceUSA will post the vote results of the House vote on ENDA as soon as they become available.  Be sure to see how your representative voted on this dangerous bill.

posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:21:59 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, October 30, 2007
The Washington Blade (homosexual news publication) explains the strategy of the “gay rights” agenda while offering critique to help proponents obtain the ultimate goal of same-sex marriage.  The article suggests a “incremental” approach in which marriage and civil unions are not discussed until the public is “ready.”

A suggested plan of attack includes these stages of building in this order:

  1. Hate Crimes
  2. ENDA
  3. Repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
  4. Permanent Partners Immigration Act
  5. Civil Unions
  6. Repeal Defense of Marriage Act and Overturn State Marriage Amendments

Click here to read the full explanation.