AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us









 Friday, November 16, 2007
The Hill newspaper reports.  Excerpt:

One hundred ninety-four out of 200 House Republicans are backing the effort to block the anticipated revival of the Fairness Doctrine, which they believe is a tool Democrats will use to cut down on the number of conservative radio talk shows. The Fairness Doctrine was discarded by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) during the Reagan administration in 1985. Not one Democrat has signed the petition, which requires 218 signatures to trigger a vote.

 

The six Republicans who have opted not to sign Pence’s petition are Reps. Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), Robin Hayes (N.C.), Timothy Johnson (Ill.), Mike Rogers (Ala.), John McHugh (N.Y.) and Ralph Regula (Ohio).

posted on Friday, November 16, 2007 7:14:54 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Bishop Harry Jackson, Jr. voices his concerns with a number of issues he sees as a threat to religious freedom.  Doubtless the ENDA bill and hate crimes legislation are clear and present dangers to free religious expression, and the movement to resurrect the discredited “fairness doctrine” is a blatant affront to free speech.  Read Jackson’s full column here.

For more information on religious freedom click here or here.

posted on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 8:28:14 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, November 08, 2007
Accuracy in Media warns that upcoming Senate hearings could be a vehicle for instituting the so-called “fairness doctrine” which would force broadcasters to give equal time to all political views.  

The Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007 would prohibit the FCC or any future president from reinstituting this ill-conceived policy.  Upon proposing H.R. 2905, Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) said:

The American people love a fair fight, especially where the issues of the day are debated. In a free market, fairness should be determined based upon equal opportunity, not equal results. As some voices are calling for Congress to enforce their idea of ‘fairness’ upon the American people, it would be good for us to proceed with caution whenever some would achieve their ‘fairness’ by limiting the freedom of others.

Congressman Pence has also posted on his blog a helpful resource entitled “Myths vs. Facts On the Fairness Doctrine.”

posted on Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:13:44 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, November 01, 2007
WNDU reports on this reversal of a controversial prayer ruling in Indiana.  The Alliance Defense Fund comments here.

posted on Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:32:44 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, October 31, 2007
John Fund writes in the Wall Street Journal about the efforts to resurrect the “Fairness Doctrine” for talk radio and the danger it poses to First Amendment speech rights.

posted on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 9:34:49 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, October 05, 2007
“The fairness doctrine flies in the face of the First Amendment.”

     -Sen. Norm Coleman

Pointing out that the “fairness doctrine” is not fair at a Heritage Foundation event today (video posted tomorrow) Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) said “the fairness doctrine is the biggest misnomer since jumbo shrimp.”  He went on to explain how the fairness doctrine violates the First Amendment’s protections of free political speech.  He asked rhetorically if we really wanted government regulators monitoring broadcasts with pencil, paper, and stopwatch enforcing their idea of “fair and balanced.”

Fortunately Sen. Coleman did not expect fairness doctrine legislation to make any progress in the current Congress but voiced his fears that a future liberal administration combined with a liberal Congress would quickly introduce such dangerous legislation.

Congressman Thomas Price had a helpful piece published yesterday entitled “The Left’s Push to Silence Free Speech.”

posted on Friday, October 05, 2007 2:44:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, June 29, 2007

We have great news for talk radio fans, conservatives, and defenders of free speech.  Reps. Mike Pence (R-IN), Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) yesterday proposed an amendment to the House Financial Services Appropriations bill that prevents federal funds from being used to enforce the “fairness doctrine” on talk radio and other media outlets should the onerous regulation ever be revived (as several U.S. Senators have suggested).  We are happy to report that the amendment passed overwhelmingly.


To see how your representative voted on the Pence Amendment click here.  For more information on the Pence Amendment check these articles from the Muncie Free Press (click here and here).

posted on Friday, June 29, 2007 4:29:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 28, 2007

Some members of Congress are talking about resurrecting the “fairness doctrine” for talk radio, a decades-old federal regulation (dropped by President Reagan) which mandated that radio and TV broadcasts were supposed to give equal time to opposing sides of any given political issue (remember all the conservative commentators of the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s?).  Under the pretense of “ensuring both sides are heard” and fixing the supposed “structural defects” that allow conservatives to dominate talk radio, members of Congress such as Senators Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) are proposing that radio stations be subjected to FCC regulation to ensure that “progressives” (i.e. liberals) are allowed equal time.  Since the “progressive” (liberal) AirAmerica radio network didn’t catch on with the American public, liberals have decided to mandate you be exposed to liberal viewpoints. This could have the effect of stifling a popular and informative medium, but more importantly it presents a dangerous threat to free speech rights found in the First Amendment.  Such obviously unconstitutional and un-American legislation must be steadfastly opposed, and legislators who support such foolishness should be held accountable.

For all their supposed concern about the “unfair” imbalance of opinion on talk radio, one would think they would be just as eager to federally mandate “fairness” in newspapers and network TV.  Hmm…Go figure.

UPDATE: This article by Rich Galen at TownHall gives some important historical perspective on the nefarious fairness doctrine.


posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:40:11 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 25, 2007

The Supreme Court today ruled that Wisconsin Right to Life had the right to run issue advertisements which urged citizens to call Sen. Kohl and Sen. Feingold and ask them not to obstruct President Bush’s judicial nominees.  The pro-life group was prosecuted under the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, and an appeals court ruled their communication was unlawful political speech because it referred to specific candidates and occurred too close to the 2004 elections.  The Supreme Court’s decision today is not just a victory for one pro-life organization but is an encouraging development for those championing the cherished right of free speech.

 

To read the Court’s decision click here.

posted on Monday, June 25, 2007 9:45:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Today George Will writes about the outrageous case in Oakland, California in which government employees were forbidden to mention such “offensive” words as “natural family,” “marriage,” and “family values.”  This is a blatant assault on First Amendment rights of free speech.  Unfortunately, many in American political discourse have sought through legislation or the courts to silence the views of their ideological opponents rather than engaging them in open debate.

posted on Monday, June 25, 2007 4:15:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Conservatives have long been skeptical of "reform" proposals and some of the recent "lobby reform" proposals certainly merit such skepticism.  This Heritage Foundation report mentions one such proposal which would limit the free speech rights of American citizens and dangerously isolate the administration from public opinion.

For information on other dangerous "lobby reform" proposals click here.

posted on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:11:59 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, May 14, 2007

John Fund writes in this great piece about Rep. Marty Meehan's bill, H.R. 2093, and how it threatens free speech and our right to petition our government.  This bill lumps grassroots activists and ordinary citizens in with official "lobbyist" while putting onerous "disclosure" requirements on them thus shielding elected officials from the will and accountability of the people For more information on the dangers of lobby reform click here.

posted on Monday, May 14, 2007 8:25:53 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #