AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us









 Friday, June 27, 2008
posted on Friday, June 27, 2008 6:26:14 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
posted on Friday, June 27, 2008 6:25:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Two bills (which were combined into one bill, H.R. 2176) which would have expanded gambling were defeated on Wednesday.  Also, attempts to undermine the Unlawful Internet Gambling Act were also defeated in the House.  CitizenLink reports.

The AP also reports.

posted on Friday, June 27, 2008 6:05:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 23, 2008
It’s nice to know, in this time of marriage confusion, that the Alliance Defense Fund is seeking to protect marriage in New York from the governor’s recent policy of forcing New York to recognize out-of-state “gay marriages.”

posted on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:32:22 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, June 20, 2008
Those in Congress now trying to kill the effective DC school voucher program would do well to check out the website www.voicesofschoolchoice.org where they could see testimonials of people who have been positively impacted by school choice programs.

posted on Saturday, June 21, 2008 2:16:30 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, June 18, 2008
posted on Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:09:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 17, 2008
As this NPR article demonstrates, when “gay rights” and religious liberty conflict, religious liberty usually loses.  This is an important fact to emphasize as gay couples are now obtaining marriage licenses in California.

A few examples cited by NPR:

A few cases: Yeshiva University was ordered to allow same-sex couples in its married dormitory. A Christian school has been sued for expelling two allegedly lesbian students. Catholic Charities abandoned its adoption service in Massachusetts after it was told to place children with same-sex couples. The same happened with a private company operating in California.

 

A psychologist in Mississippi who refused to counsel a lesbian couple lost her case, and legal experts believe that a doctor who refused to provide IVF services to a lesbian woman is about to lose his pending case before the California Supreme Court.

 

And then there's the case of a wedding photographer in Albuquerque, N.M.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:26:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:16:39 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Ken Blackwell comments on the dangerous national implications of the California Supreme Court ruling mandating “gay marriage.”  Excerpt:

Few realize that two aspects of California’s same-sex marriages are unlike Massachusetts’, and could redefine marriage in every state. And most people might not realize it before November’s election.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:13:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 12, 2008
The future of school choice could be in danger if Congress’s attitude toward the successful DC voucher program is any indication.

posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:19:41 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Daniel Herbster reporting

I had the opportunity to interview Rick Schatz, the President and CEO of the National Coalition for the Protection of Children & Families, about his work protecting families.  Here is my interview with Rick.

DH: What is the mission of the National Coalition?  Are you primarily concerned with local or national issues?

RS: Our mission at the National Coalition for the Protection of Children & Families is to move the people of God to embrace, live out, preserve and advance the truth of biblical sexuality. We address and are concerned about pornography, the sexualized messages of the culture, premarital sex among teens and young adults, marriage and the redefinition of marriage, and the homosexual political agenda.  We are concerned with both national and local issues.  On the national level, we work with denominations, major corporations, the Department of Justice, Federal Communications Commission, and CTIA – The Wireless Association.  Locally, we work with churches, Christian schools, para-church ministries and individual believers and their families through our regional offices located in Atlanta, Charlotte, Columbus, Kansas City, New England, Seattle, St. Louis and here in Cincinnati where our corporate headquarters are located.

DH:  How did it get started?

RS:  Jerry Kirk was senior pastor of College Hill Presbyterian Church in Cincinnati. Through his counseling he recognized pornography and the sexualized culture were having a devastating impact on marriages and especially young people.  He formed the National Coalition in 1983 and then left the pastorate at College Hill in 1986 to be full time with the National Coalition. 

DH:  What are some of your greatest achievements as an organization?

RS:  From a national perspective, we have encouraged the development, passage and implementation of some of the strongest legislation in our nation’s history focused on illegal pornography and sex tourism.  We have encouraged law enforcement efforts of the Justice Department and FCC, and have challenged corporations such as Abercrombie & Fitch, AT&T and General Motors to leave the pornography business and reduce the sexual content of their marketing efforts. 

We have developed some powerful materials, both written and visual, educating pastors, Christian leaders, parents and young people about the threat of pornography and the sexualized culture in which we live.  In addition, we have brought together the broadest range of the faith community in the history of our country to address pornography by forming the Religious Alliance Against Pornography (RAAP) in 1986.  RAAP has been used to meet with two Presidents and five Attorneys General over the years and has played a major role in educating the faith community in the United States.

Through our regional offices, we have worked with hundreds of churches and Christian schools across the country through the distribution of materials, speaking engagements, conferences and retreats.  Our website and media and public relations efforts have reached millions of Americans with the message of the National Coalition and have encouraged parents to talk to their children about sexuality and the threats of our culture.

DH:  How can people make a difference in their communities for families and against pornography?  What are some practical steps they could take to make their communities safer and cleaner?

posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:17:53 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
CitizenLink reports on this potentially precedent-setting court case.  Excerpt:

 
Jennifer Siperko and Christine Stadter were in a lesbian relationship when Siperko had a child through artificial insemination. Stadter did not adopt the child, and more than a year after the birth, the couple broke up. Stadter argued she should be considered a "de facto" parent. The "de facto" parent doctrine has been used by same-sex "marriage" activists to undermine marriage and weaken the rights of parents.

 

Liberty Counsel represented Siperko.

 

"The decision by the Virginia Court of Appeals is a model of judicial restraint," said Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel. "The court affirmed the fundamental right of parents and recognized that third parties may not interfere with the rights of fit parents to raise and educate their children.

posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
CitizenLink reports, concluding that “both candidates could do more for life, marriage, family.”

posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:32:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
CitizenLink reports and makes the case that families would be hardest hit by tax hikes.

posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:30:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 05, 2008
In a move the Alliance Defense Fund describes as “a vote for nationwide legal chaos” the California Supreme Court has rejected the pleas of pro-family supporters and state attorneys general and will press to quickly institute its recent ruling mandating “gay marriage” despite the expressed will of the people.  The reason this decision means chaos for other states is that many gay couples from other states will certainly come to California to take advantage of the “gay marriage” ruling and then return to their home state and sue for marriage privileges.  Given the fact that liberal activist judges occupy benches in many states, it is almost certain that we will see more instances of court imposed same-sex marriage in the near future.

Clearly our nation needs a Federal Marriage Protection Amendment to prevent unelected judges from instituting “gay marriage” through judicial fiat.  Call your representative today and urge him or her to cosponsor and vote for the Marriage Protection Amendment.

For more information on protecting marriage in California check ProtectMarriage.com.

posted on Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:33:58 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Congressman Paul Broun (R-GA) has reintroduced the Federal Marriage Protection Amendment.  The recent debacle in California demonstrates the need to protect the institution of marriage from activist judges.  The Washington Blade reports (note: this is a gay publication).

For more information check the marriage page.

posted on Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:26:36 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Pro-marriage forces in California have struck back after the recent state Supreme Court decision which recognized same-sex marriage in California.  The secretary of state verified that supporters had obtained enough citizen signatures to place a marriage protection amendment to the state constitution on the 2008 ballot.  If the amendment passes marriage in California will be defined as the union of one man and one woman thus protecting the sacred institution of marriage from unelected judges.

As CitizenLink reports, the attorney generals of 10 states have asked the California Supreme Court to delay the implementation of its same-sex marriage ruling until the people of California decide on the matter in November so that activist judges do not mandate “gay marriage” on other states under the “full faith and credit” clause of the U.S. Constitution.

For more information on the campaign to protect marriage in California check out ProtectMarriage.com.

posted on Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:18:32 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
This New York Times article should be a warning to supporters of “gay marriage” that there could be a high political price among minority communities over their disregard for traditional marriage.

posted on Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:42:00 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, May 30, 2008
The New York Times reports.  Excerpt:

 
Opponents of same-sex unions were pondering a range of legal and legislative challenges to Gov. David A. Paterson’s new policy of having state agencies honor same-sex marriages that have been performed outside New York.

posted on Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:48:46 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Maggie Gallagher explains the “gay marriage” fiasco in California and highlights the campaign to amend the California constitution to protect traditional marriage from activist judges.

posted on Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:40:30 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, May 29, 2008
New York Governor David Paterson is seeking to change state regulations in order to recognize same-sex marriages from Canada and states like California and Massachusetts.  As the assault on traditional marriage continues the need for a Federal Marriage Protection Amendment becomes all the more clear.  The New York Times reports.  Excerpts:

 
Gov. David A. Paterson has directed all state agencies to begin to revise their policies and regulations to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions, like Massachusetts, California and Canada.

 

Groups that oppose gay marriage said the governor was essentially trying to circumvent the Legislature.

 

“It’s a perfect example of a governor overstepping his authority and sidestepping the democratic process,” said Brian Raum, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a national organization opposed to same-sex marriage. “It’s an issue of public policy that should be decided by the voters.”

posted on Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:43:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Sen. Sam Brownback and David Blankenhorn write an enlightening piece about the destructive incentives our government engenders toward the family through its tax policy and welfare programs and what Congress should do to eliminate the “marriage penalty.”  Excerpt:

 
We believe that the time is ripe to transcend the usual partisan politics and implement a plan to stop penalizing lower-income couples who do the right thing — for themselves and their children — and get married. That's something all of us, regardless of political persuasion, should be able to agree on.

posted on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:08:03 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
posted on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:03:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Frank Turek at Townhall.com explains.  Excerpt:

 
Why not legalize same-sex marriage?  Who could it possibly hurt?  Children and the rest of society. That’s the conclusion of David Blankenhorn, who is anything but an anti-gay “bigot.” He is a life-long, pro-gay, liberal democrat who disagrees with the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexual behavior. Despite this, Blankenhorn makes a powerful case against Same-Sex marriage in his book, The Future of Marriage. 

 

He writes, “Across history and cultures . . . marriage’s single most fundamental idea is that every child needs a mother and a father. Changing marriage to accommodate same-sex couples would nullify this principle in culture and in law.” 

posted on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:21:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, May 23, 2008
posted on Friday, May 23, 2008 7:30:15 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, May 22, 2008
posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:32:11 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
NBC Augusta reports that Congressman Paul Broun (R-GA) intends to reintroduce the Federal Marriage Protection Amendment.  Apparently the recent outrageous decision by the California Supreme Court convinced Rep.  Broun of the necessity of federal action in this case to prevent unelected judges from spreading “gay marriage” from one state to another.

We thank Rep. Broun for his leadership in this issue and encourage our readers to call their representatives and urge him or her to cosponsor and vote for Broun’s marriage amendment.

posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:31:13 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Paul Weyrich explains.  Excerpt:

 
For many years the teachers unions used scare tactics to prevent school choice programs from enactment. They claimed that voucher programs would destroy the public school system. In fact, faced with competition, school choice has actually strengthened the public schools. Now that the public is able to see that union propaganda was a big lie citizens are more willing to consider vouchers. This is especially true now that it is widely acknowledged that the public school system is broken, graduating young people who hardly can read or write and who fail math and science.

 

At a time when conservatives are in a funk, believing that nothing good is happening in America, it is time to celebrate this milestone development in Georgia. This is a victory not just for Georgians but for all parents who are concerned with the state of public education in these United States.

posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:25:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Fred Thompson talks about the recent ruling in California.  Excerpt:


So, more power to the people of California in their uphill battle for an amendment to their state constitution. But the real, long-term solution in the future for supporters of the rule of law is ensuring the selection and election of good judges, judges who know their role in a constitutional republic, in the first place, and holding them – and the politicians who appoint and confirm them – accountable.

We would also point out that the CA ruling illustrates the need for a Federal Marriage Protection Amendment to permanently protect the traditional definition of marriage from activist judges who would love to spread same-sex marriage from states like California and Massachusetts to the rest of the country.

posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:21:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 21, 2008
The Baltimore Sun reports.  It is a shame that such a common sense ruling should be so surprising.  In the interests of parental rights and traditional marriage, let’s hope that the precedent set by the Maryland Supreme Court will be followed by courts across the country (especially in Virginia).

posted on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 6:21:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Conservatives, families, and all Americans should rejoice in the news that the Supreme Court on Monday upheld a sensible law against child pornography, ruling that the 11th Circuit Court was wrong to declare the pornography restrictions unconstitutional.  Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that “child pornography harms and debases the most defenseless of our citizens” adding “both the state and federal governments have sought to suppress it for many years, only to find it proliferating through the new medium of the Internet.”  This is a victory for children, families, and the nation.  Our collegue Justin Hart with the Lighted Candle Society also writes about the significance of this decision at FamilyFragments.org.  This ruling also illustrates the need for better judges on the federal appellate courts who understand their proper role and who understand that the Constitution does not protect obscenity or the exploitation of children.

As Janice Shaw Crouse explains, the link between pornography and sexual abuse and even the modern day slavery of sex trafficking is clear and undeniable.

See also: pro-morality page

posted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:46:28 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Neil McCluskey writes about school choice at National Review Online.

posted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:19:21 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, May 19, 2008
As only he can, Dinesh D’Souza aims his intellect and gift for expression at the issue of same-sex marriage arguing that its institution by activist judges is a threat to democracy itself.  He also helpfully explains why defending the preservation of the traditional definition of marriage does not threaten the Constitutional rights of homosexuals.  Excerpt:

 
We already know what California citizens think about gay marriage: they oppose it. A referendum outlawing gay marriage was passed with the support of the state's voters. More than 60 percent of voters cast their ballots against gay marriage.

 

How, then, can a court invalidate the referendum and over-rule the will of the people? Basically through a kind of legal fraud. The court has to pretend that there is a right to gay marriage even though it is nowhere evident in the state constitution. Read the constitution, hold it up to the light, squeeze lemon juice on it--you won't see a right to gay marriage in there. It is simply not an enumerated right, nor is it a right that can be clearly derived from other enumerated rights.

 

In issuing its ruling the California court appealed to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The basic logic is that gays have a right to be treated like everyone else. But just like everyone else, gays do have the right to marry. They have the right to marry adult members of the opposite sex! What gay activists want is something else: the right to marry members of the same sex. This is not a right currently enjoyed by anyone. What these gay activists seek is not equal treatment but rather to change the definition of marriage.

posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 8:35:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Carol Platt Liebau explains at townhall.com.

posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 8:31:07 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
The AP explains which states have marriage protection amendments, which have instituted gay marriage or civil unions, and which states could vote on marriage in November.

To see a breakdown of this information continue reading:

posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 8:28:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
posted on Monday, May 19, 2008 8:19:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, May 15, 2008
In a blatant display of judicial activism, four out of seven members of the California Supreme Court have ruled that the state must recognize same-sex marriages.  In overturning the clear will of the people, California becomes the second state (after Massachusetts) to legalize same-sex marriage by judicial fiat.