AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us









 Friday, June 27, 2008
posted on Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44:52 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 26, 2008
The House Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee is now holding hearings entitled “An Examination of Discrimination Against Trangender Americans in the Workplace.”  View the live video here.

One of the goals of these hearings is to advance legislation which would require businesses and religious organizations to hire cross dressers and sex-change operation recipients despite any religious or moral convictions which would be violated.

posted on Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:23:47 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 23, 2008
As this gay publication reports, Congress will hold hearings on dangerous legislation such as ENDA which would endanger religious liberty at the expense of a misguided notion of “gay rights.” 

posted on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:40:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 17, 2008
As this NPR article demonstrates, when “gay rights” and religious liberty conflict, religious liberty usually loses.  This is an important fact to emphasize as gay couples are now obtaining marriage licenses in California.

A few examples cited by NPR:

A few cases: Yeshiva University was ordered to allow same-sex couples in its married dormitory. A Christian school has been sued for expelling two allegedly lesbian students. Catholic Charities abandoned its adoption service in Massachusetts after it was told to place children with same-sex couples. The same happened with a private company operating in California.

 

A psychologist in Mississippi who refused to counsel a lesbian couple lost her case, and legal experts believe that a doctor who refused to provide IVF services to a lesbian woman is about to lose his pending case before the California Supreme Court.

 

And then there's the case of a wedding photographer in Albuquerque, N.M.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:26:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
CitizenLink reports.  If the dangerous “hate (thought) crimes” and ENDA legislation now in Congress gets passed into law, we could see similar persecution in the United States.

posted on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:14:07 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, June 12, 2008
Brian Fitzpatrick explains how the modern push for “gay rights” endangers religious liberty.  He catalogues the outrageous international cases of religious discrimination and demonstrates how legislation currently being pushed in Congress will bring such restrictions to the United States.

Our friends at FRC have also been sounding the alarm.  If you don’t want churches, private schools, and businesses to be forced to hire homosexuals or “transgendered” people and you don’t want Christians to be persecuted for their religious convictions contact Congress today.  Call both your senators and your representative and urge them to vote against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act or any legislation giving “domestic partnership” benefits to homosexual couples.

posted on Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:29:56 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 10, 2008
LifeSite reports this sad news of what can happen under “non-discrimination” laws.

posted on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:40:40 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Two preachers in England were threatened with arrest for “hate crimes” for witnessing to Muslims.  Let’s hope “hate crimes” legislation doesn’t spread to America.

posted on Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:20:13 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, May 30, 2008
It appears the Colorado Legislature is trying to keep up with California for nuttiness.  As the Colorado Springs Gazette reports, Gov. Ritter signed a bill into law which would allow the “transgendered” to use whichever restroom they prefer and no private business is allowed to prohibit this activity, all in the name of so-called “non-discrimination” and “equality.”  Excerpt:

 
One aspect of the law enables transgenders - those who were born one gender but identify with the other - to use public restrooms in which they feel most comfortable.

 

Focus founder James Dobson said Thursday:

 

"Who would believe that the Colorado state Legislature and its governor would have made it legal for men to enter and use women's restrooms and locker room facilities without notice or explanation?

 

"Henceforth, every woman and little girl will have to fear that a predator, bisexual, cross-dresser or even a homosexual or heterosexual male might walk in and relieve himself in their presence."

Don’t think this kind of legislation won’t be coming to a state near you in the near future.  Liberal activist are pushing for similar legislation on the federal level such as ENDA and other items.

Keep checking AdvanceUSA Blog for the latest news on these important issues.



posted on Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:55:41 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, May 22, 2008
CitizenLink reports on the outrageous “non-discrimination” legislation in Colorado which would make “open to men, women, bisexuals, transsexuals and ‘transgendered’ individuals.”  If ENDA or similar legislation is passed in Congress, the entire country could be subjected to these kinds of policies.


Graphic source: CitizenLink
posted on Thursday, May 22, 2008 8:22:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 21, 2008
posted on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 6:30:02 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, May 07, 2008
As AdvanceUSA reported last June, when Jim Holsinger was nominated by President Bush to be surgeon general, radical homosexual interest groups smeared his reputation and convinced the U.S. Senate to stall his nomination because of his religious convictions concerning homosexuality and for sound medical reports he issued on the health dangers of homosexual activity.  Holsinger is a Methodist and has taken public stands in defense of Biblical teaching on homosexuality while serving his church in leadership positions.

It appears Jim Holsinger has been vindicated by the United Methodist Church as that body recently upheld the traditional definition of marriage and biblical teaching on sexual morality at its recent global conference.  The Institute on Religions and Democracy explains.

It has been a full year since George W. Bush first nominated Holsinger, and his nomination is still stalled in the U.S. Senate.  It is a shame that a man’s religious convictions can be used to smear his reputation and prohibit him from serving his country.

posted on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:29:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, May 06, 2008
A so-called “anti-discrimination” bill in the Colorado legislature is very similar to the proposed ENDA legislation in the U.S. Congress both of which would award special privileges to homosexuals and transgenders based on their “actual or perceived” sexual behavior.  Concerned citizens must be vigilant to oppose this kind of dangerous legislation.  The Alliance Defense Fund gave testimony against the bill which is also very relevant to the federal version.  Excerpt:

 
“The government shouldn’t cater to the agenda of political activist groups and then use the strong arm of the law to force it on the public,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Austin R. Nimocks.  “This law would not protect rights but would grant special privileges based strictly on someone’s sexual behavior.  Further, those privileges would have a significant impact on the constitutional rights of Coloradoans who have a moral objection to homosexual behavior.”

posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:47:06 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, April 30, 2008
CitizenLink warns us of this serious and dangerous issue.  Hate crimes legislation is misguided and a very real threat to religious freedom and “equal justice under law.”

posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:49:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, April 25, 2008
CitizenLink reports on this troubling sign of things to come.

posted on Friday, April 25, 2008 8:33:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, April 22, 2008
CitizenLink’s Stewart Shepherd takes a humorous yet pointed look at the recent court decision which forbad a high school football coach from even appearing to be praying with his team.

If you’ve never seen “Stoplight” before you are in for a treat.

posted on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:38:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, April 18, 2008
posted on Friday, April 18, 2008 4:22:02 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Homosexual activists gathered in our nation’s capital from a few days ago until Tax Day (today) lobbying for what they call “family values.”  Their agenda includes supposed anti-discrimination legislation like ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) and instituting laws which provide what substantively amount to marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

Concerned citizens must be careful to clearly state that we do not hate homosexuals or wish to persecute them, but that we strongly object to creating special rights and privileges based on sexual behavior and we believe that organizations and companies should have the right to deem certain behavior unacceptable for their employees.

If these legislative goals proceed they will likely include some sort of “religious exemptions” which only protect churches and other explicitly religious organizations, but which do not cover individual employers such as private companies and certain non-profits.  For example, while a Catholic church might be exempted from being forced to hire or accommodate homosexuals or same-sex couples, a Catholic businessman or leader of a faith-based charity would not be protected.  The religious freedoms of individuals should be protected, not just the religious freedom of large organizations.

The bottom line is that sexual behavior should not be given preferential treatment under law under the guise of anti-discrimination.  Also, the crucial institution of marriage should not be undermined by offering special marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

ACTION: We do not yet know when Congress will consider such legislation, but we encourage you to contact your representative and both your senators to urge them to oppose ENDA and other attempts to give substantive marriage benefits to same-sex couples.

posted on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:33:38 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
William J. Federer provides some important historical context to the oft-quoted but seldom understood phrase “separation of church and state.”

posted on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:12:02 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, April 10, 2008
The Washington Times reported in February on the case of Elaine Huguenin, a Christian photographer in New Mexico, who refused to take pictures of a lesbian civil ceremony.  Elaine is being prosecuted under anti-discrimination laws and the Alliance Defense Fund is now coming to her assistance.  This case is a chilling reminder of why anti-discrimination laws based on “sexual orientation or gender identity” should be opposed, especially on the federal level (i.e. ENDA).  Here’s an excerpt from the Times:

An evangelical Christian photographer was brought before the New Mexico Human Rights Commission after she declined for religious reasons to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony.

 

When Elaine Huguenin of Albuquerque, N.M., declined in September 2006 an e-mail request from a lesbian couple to photograph their ceremony, one of the lesbians responded by lodging a human rights complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, the state agency charged with enforcing state anti-discrimination laws and sending cases to the commission to be adjudicated.

LifeSiteNews also reported on this case.

posted on Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:37:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, April 01, 2008
CitizenLink reports on this troubling development.  AdvanceUSA has also been informed of likely moves to undermine marriage by offering special rights and benefits to same-sex couples, and will be watching federal legislation that relates to this issue closely.

posted on Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:46:03 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, March 07, 2008

The Pew Forum has provided this helpful resource for churches to know what political activities are permitted under IRS non-profit restrictions.

You can find this and other helpful resources at AdvanceUSA’s Church Involvement Page.  Pastors and churches are often too intimidated speak out on important political issues for fear of losing tax-exempt status.  Christians have a responsibility to act as “salt and light” in our society and culture, and must be armed with accurate information about what the law allows.

posted on Friday, March 07, 2008 9:36:36 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, February 28, 2008
posted on Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:11:31 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Wednesday, February 20, 2008
One would expect that Catholic organizations should be able to hire only Catholics or that religious ministries (a church soup kitchen for example) should be able to fire or refuse to hire people who violate that religion’s moral teachings on sexuality.  These common sense assumptions could be in danger if “charitable choice” is not protected in the upcoming SAMSHA vote in the Senate.

Charitable choice is what allows religious charities to accept federal funding while taking religious/moral beliefs into consideration when hiring employees.  Without these protections religious charities would be forced to compromise their most cherished beliefs in order to continue to minister effectively.  Allowing Catholic charities to only hire Catholics or to refuse to hire someone who is an openly practicing homosexual are examples of charitable choice protection.

The Center blog reports on the latest efforts to restrict this important religious liberty in the statutory provisions governing the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).  Senators should be urged to support charitable choice in SAMHSA.

Excerpt from Washington Post story:

Under the Civil Rights Act, religious groups are allowed to only hire people of their particular faith. The battle erupts over what should happen when these groups accept federal dollars.

 

Supporters of charitable choice said before it was in place many faith-based groups were treated poorly by government agencies and shied away from applying for federal money, fearing they would have to change their religious nature. Many of these groups are highly effective in helping the addicted and mentally ill, supporters said, and without charitable choice, many of them won't apply for federal aid, perhaps dropping out.

posted on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:05:39 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Congressman Randy Forbes (R-VA) has introduced a bill (H. RES. 888) which would make the first week in May “America’s Religious History Week.”  Much of the text of the bill would make a great history lesson in America’s rich religious history.  Read the full text here.  Excerpts:

Whereas political scientists have documented that the most frequently-cited source in the political period known as The Founding Era was the Bible;

 

Whereas the first act of America’s first Congress in 1774 was to ask a minister to open with prayer and to lead Congress in the reading of four chapters of the Bible;

 

Whereas in 1777, Congress, facing a national shortage of “Bibles for our schools, and families, and for the public worship of God in our churches,” announced that they “desired to have a Bible printed under their care & by their encouragement” and therefore ordered 20,000 copies of the Bible to be imported “into the different ports of the States of the Union”;

 

Whereas in 1782, Congress pursued a plan to print a Bible that would be “a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools” and therefore approved the production of the first English-language Bible printed in America that contained the congressional endorsement that “the United States in Congress assembled . . . recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States”;

 

Whereas, in 1864, by law Congress added “In God We Trust” to American coinage;

To read these quotes and many more click here.  Or for a version that includes the historical documentation check the PDF version at Rep. Randy Forbes’ website.

posted on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:00:14 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Monday, February 11, 2008
The Wall Street Journal mentions the dangerous Employment Non-Discrimination Act in an article on several anti-business bills that could progress in the current Congress.  Another concern with ENDA, besides restrictive government regulation of business, is the threat that non-discrimination laws based on “actual or perceived” sexual preferences could pose to religious freedom.

Excerpt:

…the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, passed the House of Representatives last fall. It would prohibit discrimination on the basis of "sexual orientation." In short, private-sector employers who have religious or other objections to homosexuality would be told their moral views lack legitimacy.

 

The Bush administration has announced its opposition, noting that the bill raises constitutional problems and "turns on imprecise and subjective terms that would make interpretation, compliance, and enforcement extremely difficult" and is "virtually certain to encourage burdensome litigation." Sen. John McCain is opposed to such legislation; Sens. Obama and Clinton are supporters. Sen. Edward Kennedy is expected to introduce the bill later this year in the Senate.


For more information on ENDA click here.

posted on Monday, February 11, 2008 9:07:19 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
“Charitable choice” is what allows religious charities to maintain their non-profit, tax-exempt status while being able to take religious or moral beliefs into consideration when hiring employees.  Without these protections religious charities would be forced to compromise their most cherished beliefs in order to continue to minister effectively.  For example, charitable choice is what allows a Catholic charity to only hire Catholics while refusing to hire someone who is an openly practicing homosexual.

The Center blog reports on the latest efforts to restrict this important religious liberty in the statutory provisions governing the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

posted on Monday, February 11, 2008 8:49:04 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, February 07, 2008
CitizenLink reports.  More great work from ADF.

posted on Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:40:33 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Wednesday, February 06, 2008
AdvanceUSA applauds this small but important victory for religious freedom won with the help of the Alliance Defense Fund.

posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:08:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, February 05, 2008
CitizenLink has two stories that illustrate the dangers to religious freedom implicit to “hate crimes” and “non-discrimination” laws that pertain to sexual orientation.

·         Dangerous legislation could force charities that run soup kitchens and homeless shelters to hire homosexuals

·         Teachers in U.K. Told to Avoid Saying 'Mom' and 'Dad'

posted on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:44:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Last night President Bush delivered his final State of the Union address to a combined gathering of both houses of Congress.  His speech touched on a number of important pro-life, pro-family, and religious liberty issues.

The president threw down the gauntlet on stem cell research, telling Congress that we must continue to fund ethical research because human life must be respected.  He highlighted the recent breakthrough in obtaining pluripotent stem cells from skin cells as proof that unethical research was unnecessary.  The President championed the role of faith-based organizations in providing services and changing lives far more effectively than government alone can do.  He called on Congress to allow more flexibility and local control for schools under the No Child Left Behind Act.  He also encouraged Congress to maintain “charitable choice” provisions in federal law which protect the religious hiring rights of faith-based organizations (ex: allowing a Catholic charity to hire only Catholics who share that organization’s mission and standards). 

The White House website has provided the text of the president’s address along with video links that allow you to watch the address.  To read a helpful fact sheet provided by the administration about the agenda outlined in the president’s speech click here.  To read helpful summaries of the various topics see below:

posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:34:40 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Friday, January 18, 2008
The Becket Fund reports.

Here’s an informative YouTube clip about the situation, courtesy of the Becket Fund.

posted on Friday, January 18, 2008 9:15:07 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #