AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us









 Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Today the U.S. Senate finally did its job and voted on the confirmation of Judge Leslie Southwick for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  Southwick was confirmed by a vote of 59 - 38.  His confirmation is a victory for defenders of the Constitution and a defeat for liberal extremists who support activist judges.  Before Southwick could receive his confirmation vote three-fifths of the Senate had to vote to "invoke cloture" which ended debate, prevented a partisan filibuster, and allowed a fair up-or-down vote on the nomination of Judge Leslie Southwick.  Cloture was invoked by a vote of 62 - 35.  Check the AdvanceUSA Vote Watch page to see how your senators voted on this important judicial confirmation.

For more information on this crucial nomination click here or check the Southwick category here at AdvanceUSA Blog.

Vote to End Debate on Leslie Southwick’s Nomination to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
October 24, 2007
Full Results | News Story

 

 

Yeas

 

Nays

 

PRES

 

NV

Republican

 

49

 

 

 

Democratic

 

13

 

34

 

 

3

Independent

 

 

1

 

TOTALS

 

62

 

35

 

3

 

Vote to Confirm Leslie Southwick to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
October 24, 2007
Full Results | News Story

 

 

Yeas

 

Nays

 

PRES

 

NV

Republican

 

49

 

 

 

Democratic

 

10

 

37

 

3

Independent

 

 

1

 

 

TOTALS

 

59

 

38

 

 

3

posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:40:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Brent Bozell provides a thought-provoking and eye-opening expose on the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.  The more Americans know about this gruesome company the better.

Excerpt:

As much as liberals decry major corporations that act as if they're above the law, there's always quiet when the subject is Planned Parenthood, America's No. 1 corporate provider of abortions. During its 2005-2006 fiscal year, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, reported a tidy profit of $55.8 million -- and received a record high in taxpayer funding of $305.3 million.

 

This is one corporation the media hold in the highest regard. They're not "merchants of death." That would be the tobacco companies, or gun manufacturers, or hamburger joints. These are the heroic "providers" of "a woman's right to choose."

Bozell goes on to chronicle recent specific scandals involving local Planned Parenthood branches.  Read the full article here.

posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:26:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
As reported at NRO’s Bench Memos blog Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has indicated that Judge Southwick might finally receive a fair up-or-down vote in the Senate this week.  Southwick is a highly-qualified, strong originalist nominated by President Bush to sit on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals but his nomination has been stalled due to liberal slandering of his character and distortion of his record.

VOTE TODAY: Last night our contacts on the Hill informed us of the following:

This evening Majority Leader Reid announced a time agreement regarding the votes on Judge Leslie Southwick’s nomination.

 

Under the agreement the Members have agreed to move to the cloture vote tomorrow morning at 11:00am. Should cloture be invoked (meaning more than 60 Senators vote in the affirmative), we would move immediately to the vote on final confirmation. If it is not invoked, we will return to legislative session.

Southwick would be an upstanding circuit judge who would uphold the Constitution.  Pray that the Senate treats him justly and votes to confirm his nomination.

posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:42:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
A gay publication is reporting that the dangerous ENDA bill has been postponed until next week so members can be polled to see if an amendment including “transgendered” individuals in the legislation would pass.

Also, President Bush issued a veto threat for ENDA (H.R. 3685) in a statement of administration policy issued today.  AdvanceUSA applauds the President’s bold leadership in opposing this legislation.

For more information on ENDA click here or here.

posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:35:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
Ever wonder when judicial confirmations became so politicized or what an originalist judicial philosophy looks like?  This Wall Street Journal article answers those questions while “commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the Senate vote to reject the nomination of Judge Robert Bork who was Ronald Reagan’s pick for the Supreme Court.  Citizens concerned about judicial tyranny would do themselves a service to read how Judge Bork, who Warren Burger described as “simply the best qualified nominee [of his] professional lifetime,” was so shamefully treated.

posted on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:29:49 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr., (Chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and author) has written an article criticizing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) because it endangers families and is an insult to the real civil rights movement.  First he draws a distinction between this attempt to mandate privileges based on sexual preference and the civil rights movement seeking to prevent racial discrimination.  Then he gives five reasons to oppose ENDA.  Click here to read the entire article or see below to read Jackson’s five reasons to oppose ENDA.

1. ENDA would overturn the historical basis of protected class status by adding “actual or perceived sexual orientation.” While every other federally-protected class embodies three standards: an obvious, immutable characteristic; a history of discrimination evidenced by economic disenfranchisement; and political powerlessness, “sexual orientation” falls under none of these criteria. It is an insult to African Americans to grant special protections for “sexual orientation.”

2. ENDA expands civil rights protections on the vague basis of perception. An employee or potential employee could sue an employer for his or her perception of their sexual orientation. Yet unlike the currently-protected classes of race, age, and gender in employment, sexual orientation is not scientifically verifiable. It is an offense to African Americans to equate “sexual orientation” with skin color.

3. ENDA infringes on the religious liberties of our parishioners. As shepherds of our flock, we cannot stand by while our parishioners are forced to ignore their convictions when they leave church on Sunday. ENDA requires people of faith to lay down their religious freedom at the office door. This opposes our beliefs and it is not practical – faith cannot be segmented into only one part our lives.

4. ENDA puts the integrity of our ministries in jeopardy. Many African-American churches run outreach ministries separate from the church to care for our communities. My local church runs a daycare which cares for over 200 children daily and the potential to serve another 100+ children in extended care for those who are in school. ENDA provides unclear protection for schools, while leaving ministries such as childcare, after school programs, and food and clothing banks vulnerable to ENDA mandates.

5. ENDA is a direct attack on our freedom of religion guaranteed in the First Amendment. The Free Exercise Clause in the First Amendment grants all Americans the freedom to practice their faith. ENDA stands in direct opposition to this liberty and must be rejected as a result.

posted on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:51:12 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
As reported earlier some pro-cloning members of the media have taken to utilizing the euphemistic “early stem cells” instead of the scientifically accurate term “embryonic stem cells” in an effort to mislead the public into thinking this type of research does not destroy human embryos.  Wesley J. Smith has some insightful commentary in which he observes that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) does not recognize the term “early stem cell” and challenges the Kansas City Star (and reporter Kit Wagar in particular) to use scientifically accurate terms.

He also notes that the NIH clearly defines Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) as a type of cloning, unlike what many in Missouri’s pro-cloning movement would have people believe.

For more information on the latest efforts to truly and fully ban all forms of human cloning in Missouri check AdvanceUSA’s Missouri cloning page or visit Cures Without Cloning.

posted on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:19:23 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Rutherford Institute reports on these restrictions and the illegal surveillance of a rabbi’s home.

posted on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:16:55 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) recently proposed an amendment to the Labor HHS appropriations bill which would have “prohibit[ed] the use of funds to provide abstinence education that includes information that is medically inaccurate.”   The “medical accuracy” strategy actually puts unreasonable burdens on abstinence curriculum and would end federal abstinence education as we know it if enacted.  Fortunately Sen. Lautenberg decided to remove his amendment, but there is concern among our friends on the Hill that this dangerous amendment could be reintroduced in the future.

One of the reasons liberals oppose abstinence education is the fact that less promiscuity directly threatens the profits of abortion providers and “comprehensive” sex education advocates like Planned Parenthood. 

These observations were made by Heritage Foundation scholar Robert Rector whose report entitled “Facts about Abstinence Education” makes a compelling and factual case for abstinence education.

posted on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:15:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, October 22, 2007

On Thursday night the U.S. Senate defeated an amendment by Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) which would have “prohibit[ed] the provision of funds to grantees who perform abortions.” Unfortunately, this amendment failed by a vote of 41 to 52 (vote results here). 

The Hyde Amendment, passed by Congress in 1976, forbids federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest, and danger to the life of the woman.  However organizations like Planned Parenthood often accept federal dollars and claim to use the funds for activities not related to abortions.  This amendment would have broadened current law and prevented any money from going to organizations that perform abortions (except hospitals). 

This was an important pro-life amendment and Sen. Vitter deserves our thanks for proposing it. 

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:29:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Is it really any surprise that abortion profiteers want to get a hold of our tax dollars to advance their radical “culture of death” agenda?  LifeNews reports.

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:25:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

AdvanceUSA was privileged to attend the Values Voter Summit this past weekend which hosted numerous conservative speakers and all nine major Republican presidential candidates (all Democrat candidates were invited but all declined or refused to respond).

The values voters in attendance heard from such notable speakers as Newt Gingrich, Laura Ingram, Star Parker, Robert Bork, Michael Steele, and Paul Weyrich.  Additionally, there were panel discussions about conservative women in politics, the power of the media, and battling for the culture through the movie industry.  The Summit culminated in a gala banquet honoring the life and ministry of Dr. James Dobson (video excerpts and commentary here) who took the opportunity to clarify his position on voting for a lesser party, pro-life candidate in the event the Republican party nominates a pro-choice candidate. 

The National Review observes that after the Values Voter Summit and last night’s Fox News debate, the GOP field is still wide open.

As noted earlier Mitt Romney won the overall straw poll while Mike Huckabee won among voters actually in attendance (full results here).

Continue reading to view video clips of candidate speeches at the Values Voter Summit (more will be added as they become available).

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:23:13 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports that many evangelicals are willing to vote for a third party candidate rather than compromise on abortion.

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:15:46 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Philadelphia Inquirer reports on this example of liberal intolerance and persecution directed at the Boy Scouts.

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 9:06:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
This past weekend at the Family Research Council’s Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC a straw poll was taken to determine which candidate values voters were most likely to support.  Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney won the overall poll (internet and on-site voters) while former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee won among the values voters who voted on-site.

Below are breakdowns of the poll results for the top five vote-getters courtesy of our friends at FRC.

Which of the following candidates for President would you be most likely to vote for?

Overall Results

Mitt Romney

1595

27.62%

Mike Huckabee

1565

27.15%

Ron Paul

865

14.98%

Fred Thompson

564

9.77%

Undecided

329

5.70%

Total

5,775

100%

Onsite Straw Poll Results

Mike Huckabee

488

51.26%

Mitt Romney

99

10.40%

Fred Thompson

77

8.09%

Tom Tancredo

65

6.83%%

Rudy Giuliani

60

6.30%

Total

952

100%

Full results at FRC.org.

posted on Monday, October 22, 2007 2:45:47 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Thursday, October 18, 2007
AdvanceUSA will be in attendance at this weekend’s Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC sponsored by our good friends at the Family Research Council and others.  Conservatives from around the country will be present to hear well-known conservative leaders and thinkers.  All of the Republican presidential candidates will be in attendance and a straw poll will be conducted to determine who values voters intend to support.

Check back with AdvanceUSA Blog next week to see what happens.

FRC has produced a humorous spoof of a well-know dating service (click here or see below) to illustrate the importance of really getting to know presidential candidates and seriously considering just who represents one’s values and convictions.  AdvanceUSA encourages all concerned citizens to be diligent to inform themselves about the issues and candidates facing our nation.

 

posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 2:01:38 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

As LifeNews reports Justice Antonin Scalia recently gave a great lesson in originalist jurisprudence firmly declaring that there is no “right to an abortion” contained in the U.S. Constitution.  While abortion should not be the only litmus test for appointing judges, any true “strict originalist” would be able to support Scalia’s common sense pronouncement.

posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 1:46:07 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Excerpt from Fox News article:

Among conservatives, Giuliani’s support falls from 57 percent in the head-to-head race against Clinton to 42 percent when a third-party conservative is included.

 

"While some of the conservative Christian leaders are sounding more positive about Mitt Romney despite his Mormonism, by and large they are still very negative about Giuliani," said John Gorman, chairman of Opinion Dynamics. "A significant fraction of voters who might otherwise support the Republican are also clearly not fans of the former mayor. If given a chance, they say they’ll vote for someone else. This might diminish somewhat if the election of Clinton becomes more threatening to them, but given the narrowness of recent elections, even a few points could be decisive."

Check out the detailed poll results here.

posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 1:40:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) have removed the language from the Labor-HHS Appropriations bill that would have expanded human embryo stem cell experimentation.  The language which was removed would have changed the cut-off date for utilizing embryonic stem cell lines for research from August 9, 2001 to June 15, 2007.

For more information on stem cells click here or here.

posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 1:39:05 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (H.R. 3685) was favorably reported out of the House Education & Labor committee by a vote of 27 – 21.  Four amendments were offered to the legislation in order to highlight the severe danger it poses to religious liberty and to illustrate the litigation nightmare that would ensue if enacted into law.

ENDA will be voted on soon (most likely early next week) so keep calling your representative and urging him or her to vote “No” on ENDA (H.R. 3685)!  Also, an amendment will most likely be offered on the House floor which would add “transgender” people (cross dressers, sex-change recipients, etc.) to the special privileges and regulations established by this law.

Continue reading for more information on the amendments offered and some of the statements made during committee markup today.