AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us




 Friday, June 26, 2009

The New York Times reports.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 11:02:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Washington Times editorial board explains.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 11:00:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The President of the Family Research Council submitted excellent testimony to a recent Senate committee held to discuss hate crimes legislation.  Excerpt:

 

Hate crime laws force the court to guess the thoughts and beliefs which lie behind a crime, instead of looking at the crime itself, in order to prosecute and convict someone of a hate crime. Violent crimes are already punishable by law. "Hate crime" laws put the perpetrator's thoughts and beliefs on trial. Hate crime laws are tantamount to federally prosecuting "thought crimes." The Family Research Council believes that all crime should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and that every violent crime has some form of hate behind it. All around the country, crimes are being prosecuted in the state justice systems. American justice is being done. There is simply no need for a federal hate crimes law.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:59:13 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:57:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Curt Levey explains.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:55:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

 

Perhaps the reason YouTube has so much trouble keeping pornography off its website is that it’s spending too much time removing “dangerous” pro-life content.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:50:49 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:49:07 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Wichita Liberty explains how more school choice could help Kansas.  Given the early successes seen from school choice elsewhere, especially the charter schools mentioned in this piece, we need more school choice across this nation.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:46:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Washington Post reports.  The article’s sub headline (Critics Fear That Women Will Be Exploited) says it all about the ethical concerns over the exploitation of women that is inherent to this kind of policy and to what is required to conduct forms of human cloning.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:45:14 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:44:03 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Sandy Froman explains.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:42:50 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews explains.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:35:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

OneNewsNow reports.  Hopefully, teens with think twice about taking or sending indecent photos of themselves or other teens when they realize they can be punished under child pornography laws.

posted on Friday, June 26, 2009 10:26:01 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, June 24, 2009

LifeNews reports.  Apparently President Obama finds no use for ethical considerations when it comes to controversial issues like human cloning and embryo-destroying stem cell research.  The Culture of Life Foundation offers a “Requiem for the President’s Council on Bioethics.”  Excerpt:

 

Two weeks ago President Obama sent a memo to the members of the President’s Council on Bioethics (PCB) [1] informing them that their appointments were being prematurely terminated.

posted on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:10:44 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.  Excerpt:

 

Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., sent a letter to key leaders in the religious community asking them to oppose the bill.

 

"Please tell your congregation this legislation is not about 'hate' (all violent crimes are hateful); it is about taking away your freedom to speak and preach biblical truth," DeMint wrote. "It will take away your right to say that some things are wrong. We need millions of Americans to call and email their Senators, especially Democrat Senators who are pushing this legislation."

posted on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:08:44 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:06:53 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The DC Examiner reports.  Excerpt:

 

Researchers at the Children's Hospital & Research Center in Oakland, California have discovered a new way to harvest stem cells from the placenta.  This technique is a good use of the placenta which at the moment serves no medicinal purpose after birth and thus is discarded. What is more, the study “finds there are far more stem cells in placentas than in umbilical cord blood, and they can be safely extracted for transplantation.”

posted on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:05:39 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.

posted on Thursday, June 25, 2009 12:03:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

OneNewsNow reports.

UPDTATE:  OneNewsNow reports that the teacher has been reinstated.

posted on Wednesday, June 24, 2009 11:52:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 22, 2009

Charmaine Yoest explains how Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s position on abortion could be considered worse than David Souter, whom President Obama has chosen to replace with Sotomayor.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:54:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

OneNewsNow reports.  Excerpt:

 

"The crimes that took place [Tiller murder and Holocaust Museum shootings] have absolutely nothing to do with the content of the hate crimes bill, which only really is focusing on the special treatment and special privileges of protection to be granted to people because of their homosexuality or transsexual status," he contends.

 

Dacus adds that "the bill is not about providing equal treatment -- it's providing unequal treatment," which he believes is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

 

"The hate crimes bill accomplishes nothing except to intimidate and silence legitimate, peaceful opposition to the never-ending demands of the gay and transsexual activists," he concludes.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:53:08 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Dr. Mary L. Davenport explains on the FRC website.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:51:47 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:50:18 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:48:47 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Monday, June 22, 2009 9:47:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, June 19, 2009

CitizenLink reports.  Excerpt:

 

The commission [U.S. Commission on Civil Rights], not known for being on the side of social conservatives on policy issues, has an ally in Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. He pointed out that hate-crimes legislation fundamentally changes the idea of equal justice under law to arbitrary justice based on the race, religion or sexual orientation of the victim or the criminal.

 

"It really forces our courts and our judges to begin to anticipate what people were thinking when they committed a crime, rather than whether they committed the crime or not."

 

But he said the worst part of the hate-crimes bill is it could restrict free speech, "because if a pastor stands up and preaches that the Word of God says that homosexuality is wrong, that pastor could be accused of hate speech and could even be accused or charged with inducing someone to commit a crime against a homosexual."

 

Urge your member of Congress to oppose hate crimes!  Also, visit FightHateCrimes.com to find out how you can help oppose this dangerous threat to religious freedom and “equal justice under law.”

 

Click here to view the Democrat press conference in support of hate crimes.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 10:05:41 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Washington Post reports.  As does Fox News. Excerpt:

 

The extended benefits include an option for employees' domestic partners to be added to a government insurance program that pays for long-term conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease. They also would be allowed to take sick leave to care for a sick partner or non-biological child.

 

CtizenLink explains how the action threatens traditional marriage and the rule of law.  Excerpt:

 

Family advocates say Obama’s action is a direct violation of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and a big step toward redefining marriage.

 

“The president thumbed his nose at the rule of law and continues to undermine marriage as society’s most pro-child institution,” said Tom Minnery, senior vice president of government and public policy for Focus on the Family Action.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 10:03:14 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports some good news from the front in the battle for traditional marriage.  Excerpt:

 

The number of Americans who support same-sex marriage has plunged over the last few months, according to a new poll.

 

The CBS News/New York Times study found that 33 percent of respondents favor same-sex marriage. That represents a 9 percent drop since April.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 10:01:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The Wall Street Journal reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:59:24 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

So says the Washington Times editorial board as it lists its concerns with Sotomayor’s record and stated views.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:57:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:55:59 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The BBC reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:54:34 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

One of the founding fathers of modern conservatism, Richard Viguere, explains.  Excerpts:

 

The confirmation fight over Judge Sonia Sotomayor shouldn't be approached as merely about filling a vacancy on the Supreme Court.  Even as important as that is, this confirmation fight is bigger than that.  It is a fight about whether the Constitution any longer constrains the power of government by and according to its terms.  It is about President Obama's view of government power versus the view held by most Americans.

Those who see this confirmation battle as about just Judge Sotomayor miss the larger point.  This is really about President Obama's harmful and dangerous view of government power.

 

President Obama wants to remake and thereby weaken America by avoiding the constraints in the Constitution and its structure for political accountability.  He is faced with circumstances that make that possible:  (1) economic turmoil, (2) a sycophantic press, (2) a passive and sympathetic Congress, and (4) a judiciary that too often refuses to insist that the other two branches act within their enumerated powers.  He has taken advantage of those circumstances to expedite his government power grab at a dizzying pace.  If Americans had time to absorb what he was doing and the freedoms they were losing, he would not succeed.

 

We are distracted by Obama's blitz because we have too many attacks on our system to confront effectively at once.  That is why it is important for conservatives to focus foremost on the Sotomayor confirmation fight.  Within that one fight alone we can address the very reasons why, as polls show consistently, conservatism is twice as popular as liberalism.  This confirmation fight can weaken Obama's march to a form of government inconsistent with the Constitution if conservatives grasp the challenge.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:53:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The DC Examiner reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:52:13 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

WorldNetDaily reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:46:28 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.

posted on Friday, June 19, 2009 9:42:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Wednesday, June 17, 2009

CitizenLink reports.  The following excerpt quotes Ashley Horn of Focus on the Family Action:

 

"As we've seen in other nations where such laws are passed, they can have a chilling effect on the free speech of those who would simply share from the Bible God's views on issues such as homosexuality," she explained. "Hate-crimes laws are unnecessary in a civil society like ours based on the rule of law.

 

"All crimes are hate crimes," she added, "To give special status to certain groups of people allows courts to reach beyond punishing people for the illegal acts they commit and judge them for what they may or may not be thinking as they commit those acts."

 

Our sources on the Hill assure us that Congress will try to push hate crimes through before the August recess.  Hate (thought) crimes are a tool of legitimizing sexual deviancy and offering special legal benefits based on sexual behavior.  It also poses a serious threat to religious liberty and “equal justice under law.”

 

Call your representative today and urge him or her to vote AGAINST dangerous and unnecessary “hate crimes” legislation!

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:17:02 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:15:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The New York Times reports.  A blog post by Ilya Somin also looks at this case and what it says about Sotomayor’s views on property rights.

 

The Washington Times editorial board also weighs in on Sotomayor and property rights.  Excerpt:

 

Judge Sotomayor served as the senior judge on one 2006 case, Didden v. Village of Port Chester, which respected University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein described as "about as naked an abuse of government power as could be imagined." Her judicial panel's ruling might be the worst violation of property rights ever approved by a federal appeals court. It is part of a pattern of Judge Sotomayor's pro-government rulings that run roughshod over the most basic of private property rights.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:14:23 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.  Excerpt:

 

Washington, D.C., elections officials have blocked a proposal that would let voters decide on whether the nation's capital will recognize same-sex marriages performed outside the District.  The Board of Elections and Ethics has suggested only Congress and the courts should have input on the issue.

 

The two-member board said that allowing a referendum that lets the people decide is akin to authorizing "discrimination."

 

CitizenLink also reports that pro-marriage leaders (led by the African American Pastor Harry Jackson, Jr.) intend to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:13:03 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

InsideBayArea.com reports.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:09:27 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Kellyanne Conway and David McIntosh explain why President Obama and Senate Democrats keep trying to portray Judge Sonia Sotomayor as an “originalist” and not a liberal activist, because that’s who Americans want on the bench by an overwhelming majority.  Opponents of judicial activism should take heart that American public opinion is with them and that their elected representatives in the Senate should be held accountable for whether they thoroughly examine Sotomayor and how they vote on her nomination.  Excerpt:

 

In a national post-election survey of 800 actual voters, the polling company, inc. found that 70% of respondents preferred that judges not base their decisions on personal views and feelings. Only 23% favored judges who would go beyond the law and take their own personal views and feelings into account.

 

These poll numbers explain why -- despite the President's personal popularity and a 60-vote majority in the Senate -- the White House must address the fact that Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of the President's standard for picking judges, as well as the standard articulated by Sotomayor throughout her career.

 

Her previous writings cast doubt on her willingness to neutrally apply the law. It is also difficult to square Sotomayor's latest overtures as a defender of restraint with the fact that President Obama already committed to picking judges with a willingness to tip the scales of justice in favor of particular parties involved.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:08:05 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Ilya Shapiro offers examples of five important questions that Sotomayor needs to address.  Hopefully, Senators on the Judiciary Committee are paying attention and plan to take their job seriously.

 

Here are the five questions:

 

  1. Can the government rewrite leases, mortgages, and other contracts?
  2. Can the government regulate activity that is neither commerce nor crosses state lines?
  3. Where in the Constitution is the right to privacy – and other unspecified rights – located?
  4. What does the nominee think of Kelo v. City of New London?
  5. Should the Supreme Court refer to foreign court decisions to help interpret US law and the Constitution?

 

Read all the commentary on why these and other questions are so important here.

posted on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:05:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Monday, June 15, 2009

Americans United for Life has posted some helpful resources on their website for exploring Barack Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, on pro-life issues.

 

Here is a summary of the facts.

 

Here are the pro-life cases she has considered.

posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 1:44:32 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Doug Billings explains in the DC Examiner.

posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 1:43:22 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Stuart Taylor takes a disturbing look at Sotomayor’s ruling which upheld a discriminatory policy against firefighters in Connecticut.

posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 1:42:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

Dr. Robert Wascher explains how adult stem cell transplantation can help people with congestive heart failure while Voice of America reports on patients who are being successfully treated for leukemia with adult stem cells.

posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 1:41:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

CitizenLink reports.  Besides the obvious ethical and right to life issues involved with human cloning, grave health concerns and women’s rights issues are also raised because of the huge demand for human ovum involved with human cloning and in the serious health risks associated with human egg donation.

posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 1:40:04 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   
 Friday, June 12, 2009

Byron York reports.  Excerpt:

 

Senate Republicans involved in the Sonia Sotomayor Supreme Court nomination say there are significant gaps in the 172-page questionnaire Sotomayor sent recently to the Senate Judiciary Committee -- omissions the GOP says will require more time to examine than is possible under the Democrats' hurry-up schedule for Sotomayor's confirmation.

 

As Bryon’s Senate source said in exasperation, “We don't know what we don't know….”  This is the very reason we need a thorough and unhurried debate on Sotomayor in the Senate Judiciary Committee and in the full Senate.

 

Take Action: Call both your senators today and urge them to promote a thorough debate on Sotomayor, and tell them that you oppose appointing radical activist judges to the Supreme Court.

posted on Friday, June 12, 2009 5:46:23 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #   

The New York Times reports.

posted on Friday, June 12, 2009 5:45:10 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #