AdvanceUSAAmericans Defending Values and National Conservative Efforts
Home PageAbout UsLinksMediaActionSurveyDonateBlogContact Us




 Friday, November 27, 2009

Charles Krauthammer reflects on the health care overhaul legislation.  Excerpts:

 

The United States has the best health care in the world — but because of its inefficiencies, also the most expensive. The fundamental problem with the 2,074-page Senate health-care bill (as with its 2,014-page House counterpart) is that it wildly compounds the complexity by adding hundreds of new provisions, regulations, mandates, committees, and other arbitrary bureaucratic inventions.

   

Worse, they are packed into a monstrous package without any regard to each other. The only thing linking these changes — such as the 118 new boards, commissions, and programs — is political expediency. Each must be able to garner just enough votes to pass. There is not even a pretense of a unifying vision or conceptual harmony.

 

. . .

 

The bill is irredeemable. It should not only be defeated. It should be immolated, its ashes scattered over the Senate swimming pool.

   

Then do health care the right way — one reform at a time, each simple and simplifying, aimed at reducing complexity, arbitrariness, and inefficiency.

posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 8:48:23 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Federal Times reports.

posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 8:47:16 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Christian Post reports.

posted on Friday, November 27, 2009 8:46:05 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Reuters reports.

 

See how your senators voted.

posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:08:10 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

 

See how your senators voted.

posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:06:29 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:05:18 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The House Republican Leader explains.

posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:04:16 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:03:06 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Wednesday, November 18, 2009

LifeNews reports.

posted on Thursday, November 19, 2009 1:01:22 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Mario Diaz reflects on the nomination of Judge Hamilton.  Excerpts:

 

It is amazing to see the media reports on the nomination of Judge David Hamilton to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The media apparently is interested in everything related to this nomination except the judge’s record.

 

. . .

 

In 2005, Judge Hamilton ordered the Speaker of the Indiana House to immediately stop the practice of “sectarian prayers” at the opening of the legislative session because the prayers were too Christian. He said that people “should refrain from using Christ’s name or title.”

posted on Thursday, November 19, 2009 1:00:26 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:59:22 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Financial Times reports.

posted on Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:58:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Monday, November 16, 2009

Fox News reports.  The Senate version of the health care bill will likely no contain protections against the taxpayer funding of abortion, according to LifeNews.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:29:27 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Star Parker explains.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:28:17 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Curt Levey reports on the brand of activism of Judge Hamilton, President Obama’s nominee for the 7th Circuit.  Excerpt:

 

This week, the Senate votes on President Obama’s nomination of District Court Judge David Hamilton to the Seventh Circuit. Because of Hamilton’s fundraising activities for ACORN, his leadership positions with the Indiana branch of the ACLU, his statements supporting judicial activism, and most importantly, his rulings putting liberal ideology above the rule of law, he is the first and only Obama circuit nominee to draw heated opposition.

There are many examples of Judge Hamilton’s tendency towards liberal judicial activism (see letter from Sen. Sessions). However, the most bizarre and controversial instance is Hamilton’s 2005 ruling prohibiting prayers that mention Jesus Christ in the Indiana House of Representatives, but allowing prayers that mention Allah. While troubling in any context, the religious double standard in Hamilton’s ruling is particularly deserving of close scrutiny in light of Major Nidal Hasan’s recent shooting rampage at Fort Hood.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:27:13 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:26:00 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ) explains.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:25:02 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:23:48 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Reuters reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:21:53 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, November 12, 2009

The AP reports.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:32:28 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Hill reports.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:31:40 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Investor’s Business Daily reports on the nomination of David Hamilton to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.  LifeNews also reports, highlighting Hamilton’s pro-abortion stance.

 

Jack Park explains Judge Hamilton’s dangerous brand of judicial activism.  Excerpt:

 

In other words, Judge Hamilton thinks that the decisions of federal district courts amend the Constitution, just as the amendment process does. This is unacceptable.

 

Judges act appropriately when they apply the law, not when they make it. And they certainly shouldn’t be in the business of trying to amend the Constitution by the whim of their decisions. Any judge who says that he or she makes law or amends the Constitution has a skewed vision of what the proper role of a judge is.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:30:42 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews provides this important reminder.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:29:20 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

John Stossel shares his perspective on the House health care vote.  Excerpt:

 

As an American, I am embarrassed that the U.S. House of Representatives has 220 members who actually believe the government can successfully centrally plan the medical and insurance industries.

 

I'm embarrassed that my representatives think that government can subsidize the consumption of medical care without increasing the budget deficit or interfering with free choice.

 

It's a triumph of mindless wishful thinking over logic and experience.

 

See how your representative voted here.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:28:31 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:27:12 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Dr. Miriam Grossman exposes the problems with Planned Parenthood’s sex education programs.  Excerpt:

 

As a physician who has spent hundreds of hours with young people with sexually transmitted infections, I’m on a one-woman mission to expose the falsehood of those claims. Planned Parenthood’s sexual health education is not comprehensive or medically accurate; to the contrary, this eminent, federally funded organization endangers lives by withholding critical biological truths.

posted on Friday, November 13, 2009 12:25:29 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Monday, November 09, 2009

LifeNews reports on the late night passage of the House health care overhaul bill on Saturday.  As does the AP and the Washington Post.

 

SEE HOW YOUR REPRESENTATIVE VOTED HERE!

 

Now it’s up to the Senate to decide the fate of the health care bill.

posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:57:04 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Hill reports.

 

LifeNews explains the Stupak amendment.

posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:55:49 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Ken Connor explains.

posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:54:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:53:22 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The Weekly Standard reports.

posted on Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:52:36 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Thursday, November 05, 2009

Bloomberg reports.  While the House Majority Leader predicts a close vote, Democrats in conservative states are rethinking their options.

 

Abortion funding in the health care bill is still a huge issue which is one of many reasons Americans are rallying to protest the bill, many of them chanting “kill the bill.”

 

Only concerned Americans like you can make a difference on this issue!

posted on Thursday, November 05, 2009 11:46:10 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Fox News reports.  Excerpt:

 

Obama chose Hamilton, a U.S. district judge in Indiana, as his first judicial nomination in March. The White House has characterized Hamilton as a moderate pick whose judicial record would temper criticism from conservative and liberal extremists -- bringing an end to the political confirmation wars that have long accompanied such judicial nominations.

 

But Republican opposition to Hamilton's nomination has emerged over rulings in a host of cases -- from barring Christian prayer in the Indiana Legislature to blocking enforcement of certain state abortion statutes.

 

In a letter penned Nov. 3 to his GOP colleagues, Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama blasted Hamilton for using his position to "drive a political agenda." Hamilton stated in a 2003 speech that the role of a judge includes "writing footnotes to the Constitution" and believes "empathy" should influence a judge's decision making, Sessions wrote.

 

The AP also analyzes the significance of the nomination of Judge Hamilton.  Excerpt:

 

Sessions made it clear his party will put up a fight against confirming either. He cited Hamilton's position in the late 1980s as a vice president for litigation and board member of the Indiana chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. Sessions also complained about Hamilton's judicial rulings.

 

"Instead of embracing the constitutional standard of jurisprudence, Judge Hamilton has embraced this empathy standard, this feeling standard. Whatever that is, it is not law. It is not a legal standard," Sessions said.

posted on Thursday, November 05, 2009 11:44:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

While families are struggling to “make ends meet” in this difficult economy, one Senate committee thinks American families can afford huge increases in energy prices.

posted on Thursday, November 05, 2009 11:38:47 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Wednesday, November 04, 2009

LifeNews reports. 

 

Word had leaked that high level Congressional Democrats are predicting that the health care bill will not pass this year.  While this sounds like encouraging news, concerned citizens still need to maintain pressure on their elected officials to make sure that the health care industry is not socialized, that health care is not rationed, and that tax dollars aren’t spent on abortion.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:49:35 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:48:18 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:47:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The AP reports.  As does the New York Times.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:46:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Economist Thomas Sowell sheds some light on the “medical costs” rhetoric in the health care debate.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:44:24 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

The editors at National Review comment on the recent elections.  Excerpt:

 

Conservatives scored some impressive victories on Election Day. In Virginia, Robert McDonnell won the governor’s race in a landslide that carried other conservative statewide officeholders and legislative candidates to victory. New Jersey’s Chris Christie won his race by a larger margin than any Republican had mustered since 1985 — and as a candidate significantly to the right of previous Republican governors such as Tom Kean and Christie Todd Whitman. Maine repealed a law that accorded official recognition to same-sex unions as though they were marriages.

posted on Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:43:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   
 Monday, November 02, 2009

Author and activist Star Parker explains.

posted on Monday, November 02, 2009 11:04:46 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

Watch the local TV news report.

posted on Monday, November 02, 2009 11:03:19 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

LifeNews reports (scroll down) on the vast difference between a justice who respects the integrity of the Constitution and one who does not.  Excerpt:

 

“The fight is about the Supreme Court inventing new rights nobody ever thought existed,” Justice Antonin Scalia said in an appearance at the University of Arizona College of Law. “Right to abortion?” he asked. “Come on. Nobody thought it violated anything in the Constitution for 200 years. It was criminal.” “They may be bad ideas,” Scalia said. “But don't tell me it’s unconstitutional.” But Justice Stephen Breyer, who shared the stage with Scalia, said his colleague was taking an overly literalistic approach to the 18th century document. He said that the changing nature of society, by necessity, requires more than looking at what Scalia called “originalism.” “You don't look to the details,” Breyer said. “You look to the value.” Scalia specifically warned that those who approach the Constitution as Breyer suggests will not always find courts expanding the definition of individual liberties. “It goes both ways,” he said. “The only thing you can be sure of is the Constitution will mean whatever the American people want it to mean today,” Scalia continued. “And that’s not what a constitution is for,” he said. “The whole purpose of a constitution is to constrain the desires of the current society.”

posted on Monday, November 02, 2009 11:02:01 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #   

FRC explains in a very helpful memo.

posted on Monday, November 02, 2009 11:00:55 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #